| Heading | | Page |
| i. | Executive Summary | | i |
| 1. | Historic Overview | | 3 |
| 2. | Reporting Responsibility | | 5 |
| 3. | Fairness Requires Local Accuracy | | 12 |
| 4. | Authorities Question Sampling's Local Accuracy | | 22 |
| 5. | Post-census Local Review Improved Local Accuracy | | 25 |
| 6. | Post-census Local Review Improved Local Accuracy - Reasons To Reinstate Post-census Local Review | | 28 |
| 7. | Parole/Probation Files Improved Local Accuracy | | 29 |
| 8. | Parole/probation Files Improved Local Accuracy - Reducing Differential Undercount49 | | 30 |
| 9. | Administrative Records Can Improve Local Accuracy | | 32 |
| 10. | Administrative Records Can Improve Local Accuracy - More Accurate Than Statistical Adjustments To Reduce Differential Undercounts | | 35 |
| 11. | Board Receives Feedback From Local Governments | | 36 |
| 12. | Endnotes | | 37 |
| 13. | Press Release | | 38 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
