|
Archive
The 9th National Conference on Strategic Planning for Government: IMPLEMENTING
THE RESULTS ACT
Washington, DC
January 21 - 22, 1998
Summary by Federal Communicators Network representative Glenn
Nordin
Executive Secretary
DCI Foreign Language Committee
Community Management Staff
glennhn@odci.gov
703.482.2677
Press Pool coordinated by Carrie Kemper, 202.208.4663.
The two-day conference presented by the International Quality &
Productivity Center was jump-started with a "cybervision" of the 21st
Century outlining the transformation of organization and processes now
underway in the Air National Guard. By using information age
technology, the Guard's leadership is gaining timely management
oversight while empowering the workforce with direct input to top-level
planning and execution. Stressing the need for performance planning
and measurement, Maj. Gen. Donald Shepperd, asked the audience to grasp
the future and the opportunities that technology and the emerging diverse
workforce offer.
As advertised and executed, the conference provided a rich mixture of
interpretations of the Government Performance Results Act of 93,
strategic management philosophy, and examples of how different
organizations have pioneered the way to better planning and execution
in response to GPRA requirement. Experience in strategic and annual
planning and performance reporting with linkage to budget submission
and execution was provided by a variety of organizations including a county
health service administration and a military base. All presenters placed
emphasis on "customer" satisfaction, validated (or at least agreed)
performance measures, managerial accountability, and consultation with
Congress as essentials to successful fulfillment of GPRA requirements.
Strategic planning based on the mission of the organization and a
vision of the future provides the goals to be attained over a finite
period of time. Collection and analysis of baseline data on the
organization and its operating environment provide the starting point
for setting measurable annual performance objectives or results. The
annual plan then incorporates the target performance results and other
stretch targets and links these to the budget submission. If possible,
consultation on the plan with the next higher level or ultimately
theappropriate congressional committee should be done early and often
to ensure mutual understanding of goals and measures. Finally, the
required annual report will provide the scorecard on agency
performance.
"It's the Law" is a general theme that ran throughout the
presentations. The Government Performance Results Act of 93 is a law
of the land and as such demands our attention in planning, budgeting,
executing and reporting to the Congress. Appropriations in future years
will be directly related to the effectiveness of performance planning
and measurement.
| |