Archive

NATIONAL GAMBLING IMPACT STUDY
COMMISSION


REPORT OF THE ACTING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Southwest Site Visit
July 30, 1998


I. INTRODUCTION

As you know, I have had the privilege of serving as the Commission's acting Executive Director for the past six weeks. During this time, we have all worked hard to make sure that the Commission office remained proactive and responsive to the agenda established by the Commissioners. I am proud of the extent to which we have accomplished that objective. Our hearings are on schedule, the research agenda is in full gear, and we are preparing to staff up for vear two, which will focus on the subcommittee work, analysis of the research collected and the report due to federal, state and tribal governments in June 1999.

II. HEARINGS

Southwest Site Visit (Del Mar/Tempe): By now. you can judge for yourself the high quality and sophistication of panel presentations assembled for our fourth site hearing in Del Mar and here in Tempe. Thank you for the generous time and assistance many of you provided during the long process required to define panels and select presenters. I hope that you found the background materials and briefing papers to be helpful as you considered the complex issues raised over these two days. I want to also thank Rick Hill and Jacob Coin of the National Indian Gaming Association for their assistance in identifying relevant tribal leaders. It has been a pleasure to work with them.

This is the first hearing that included time for all four subcommittees to meet, and that has proven to be extremely helpful. Special recognition should go to the Indian Gambling Subcommittee Commission - Moore, Wilhelm, and Loescher - for their work to provide valuable face-to-face time with Tribal leaders on Tuesday in Del Mar, tomorrow at the Gila River Reservation. and-Saturday in Albuquerque. I remind you that all Commissioners are, of course, invited to all such meetings.

Southeast Site Visit (Biloxi/New Orleans): Thanks again for your help in defining panels and selecting presenters for the MS/LA hearing. The resultant proposed panels are listed in the Work Plan Update under tab 6 in your briefing book. Since we have a shorter period than usual to prepare for this visit - six weeks - I would ask your help in responding quickly to our draft agenda and panelist requests. We will be sending you a draft skeleton agenda of panels for your consideration late next week.

Nevada Site Visit: It seems particularly fitting that our final site hearing, before we shift to focusing on findings and report writing will be Las Vegas. Last month I was able to advance our upcoming visit, since I was in Las Vegas for a conference. Governor Miller and Commissioner Bible's office were particularly helpful in arranging meetings with relevant individuals and groups. I met with several panels from Governor Miller's NGISC Visit Facilitation Committee, visited the impressive MGM Grand facilities. and sat in on a treatment group for pathological gamblers. Governor Miller's office coordinated much of the agenda, and the meetings were both informative and collegial. I think it's fair to say that the Visitation Committee is putting a tremendous effort into preparing for our arrival and that they stand ready to assist in any way possible. Much of my discussion with them focused on the availability of data sources (such as total casino revenues, number and quality of jobs, etc.) that might be helpful for the Commission as we prepare for Nevada. The Governor's Chief of Staff was particularly helpful in offering to collect such information for us, and I am glad to see them present at this meeting as well.

The proposed panel definitions for Nevada are listed in the Work Plan Update a tab 6 in your briefing book. I invite further ideas you may have for panel definitions for our final site hearing.

III. RESEARCH

Following is a progress report on the Commission's research agenda to date. The Commission's five primary research contracts have been let, and the selected researchers and research organizations are hard at work on our behalf. Attached you will find a more detailed progress report from the three major contractors - NORC, NRC, and ACIR. The following is a brief summary:

1. NATIONAL SURVEY & COMMUNITY DATABASE RESEARCH ON GAMBLING BEHAVIORS AND THEIR SOCIAL & ECONOMIC CORRELATES: THE NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER (NORC) CONTRACT

NORC has developed the survey instrument, or questionnaire, for the national phone survey. It has been extensively reviewed by the Research Subcommittee and was also sent to all Commissioners for comments. We appreciate the tremendous amount of time the Commissioners have devoted to this to ensure that the instrument is fair, objective and representative. Commissioner Lanni also provided ,several recommendation, and we are currently responding to these.

At the same time, NORC is "pretesting" the questionnaire to fine tune flow and content. We are on schedule for a national survey to take place in early fall. NORC has also developed a shortened version of the questionnaire for the patron survey pilot study per the direction of the Research Subcommittee. Once questionnaire pretesting is completed, and pilot sites selected, the pilot study will be ready to move forward.

A full discussion of the issues raised on the NORC contract is included in the attached NORC report.

2. RESEARCH ON PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING LITERATURE: THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (nrc) CONTRACT

The NRC is continuing to move ahead with their work on pathological gambling literature, having held an open workshop on prevalence and etiology on June 1-2 in lrvine, CA. Their next and last open workshop is scheduled for September 2-3 in Washington, DC. This meeting will focus on treatment for pathological gambling and social and economic impacts. Please let me know if you or your staff would be interested in attending and I will send directions to you.

For more information, please see the attached NRC progress report and notes on major issues discussed at workshop meetings to date.

3. REVIEW OF LAW AND REGULATIONS ON INDUSTRY AND NATIVE AMERICAN GAMBLING: THE ADVISORY CENTER ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS CONTRACT

The ACIR work on gambling laws and regulation is proceeding on schedule. ACIR has contracted with consultants from American University who will help guide and produce their report and they have already conducted several literature searches.

For more information, please see the attached ACIR progress report.

4. RESEARCH UPDATE ON LOTTERIES: THE CLOTFELTER AND COOK CONTRACT

We are just completing the contracting process for lottery research with Drs. Cook and Clotfelter. which includes working through the contract office of Duke University. Cook and Clotfelter have asked the Commission to help generate the needed state lottery data. For that reason, the Research Subcommittee is developing a questionnaire to send to state lottery directors, which was recently sent to all Commissioners for comment and review. We hope to send the request to state lottery directors next month. The resultant data will be a tremendous asset to Cook and Clotfelter as they update their classic lottery study for the Commission.

5. RESEARCH ON CASINO COMMUNITY ECONOMIC IMPACT: THE ROSE CONTRACT

Dr. Rose is moving ahead with his work synthesizing the literature on casino economic development. If possible, I am hoping that he may be able to deliver a preliminary report to the Commission in Biloxi or New Orleans since we will be focusing their on economic impact issues.

IV. OPERATIONS

Budget. Per the Chair's instruction as well as my own inclination, we are reviewing several potential cost-cutting measures. We are reviewing administrative overhead, conference costs, etc., in order to make sure that no funds are wasted and that we allocate as much as possible to our many research initiatives. For more information, please refer to the budget in TAB 5 of your briefing book.

Communications/Intergovernmental Affairs. We continue, of course, to respond to any and all media inquiries, and our website continues to receive numerous of hits daily. Also, per the Chair's instruction, I have met with the following officials involved with Native American Gambling: Chris Stearns. Democratic Counsel, House Committee on resources (7/1/98); Gary Bohnee, Majority Staff Director, Senate Committee on Indian Affairs (7/2/98); Lloyd Jones, Majority Chief of Staff, House Committee on Resources (7/7/98); Rick Hill, Chairman, and Jacob Coin, Executive Director, National Indian Gaming Association; Kevin Grover, Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior (7/22/98), and; Patricia Zell, Minority Chief of Staff, Senate Committee on Indian Affairs (7/24/98). These meetings are part of an attempt to locate relevant information and panelists and input for our important tasks.

IV. CONCLUSION

At this point, as the Chair has indicated, the Commission is at a strategic point in its work. The first year, we focused primarily on operational set-up and site visit preparations. Further, we worked hard to develop the groundwork and vehicles for our scientific research contracts. At the start of our second year, we are prepared to begin the final efforts on site visits, and the difficult tasks of accepting the research findings, reviewing the data, and assembling the final report. I appreciate the assistance and feedback I have received from each Commissioner and look forward to answering your questions.

Thank you.

Respectfully submitted,

Timothy A. Kelly


NGISC Home