Appendix B:
Summary of Community Meeting Data


Appendix B: Summary of Community Meeting Data

Demographic Characteristics

(N=Total Number of Respondents)

Weighted Averages1:

% of Meeting Attendees

Gender (N=3,775): 

Male
Female

37.7%
62.3%
Age in years (N=3,824):  

Under 25
25-44
45-64
65+

6.0%
25.5%
53.2%
15.3%
Hispanic Origin (N=3,805): 

Yes
No
Declined to answer2

9.1%
87.6%
3.3%

Race3 (N=3,810): 

White
Black/African-American
Asian
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
American Indian/Alaska Native
Multiple races
Other
Declined to answer2

69.5%
16.9%
2.6%
0.2%
1.7%
1.8%
3.8%
3.6%

Education (N=3,856):

Elementary
Some High School
High School Graduate/GED
Some College
Associate’s Degree
Bachelor’s Degree
Graduate/Professional Degree
Declined to answer

0.9%
1.3%
6.7%
17.1%
6.5%
23.9%
43.3%
0.5%

Source of Coverage4 (N=3,662):

Employer
Self-purchased
Veterans’ Administration
Medicare
Medicaid
Other
Uninsured
Not Sure

64.5%
8.3%
1.1%
12.6%
2.6%
3.6%
6.6%
0.7%

Employment5 (N=3,776):

Self-employed
Full-time
Part-time
Looking for work
Homemaker
Other/retired

11.6%
50.2%
8.1%
4.7%
1.7%
18.9%

1 The weighted average was calculated as the total number of individuals providing a particular response to a question across all meetings divided by the total number of individuals who answered that question at all the meetings.

2The “decline to answer” option was not provided at all meetings.

3 Classifications of race varied between meeting sites.  In some meetings, the question of race was limited to one answer whereas in other meetings, attendees were permitted to answer “multiple races.”  Also, attendees were allowed to decline to respond. 

4The question on source of health coverage was not asked in two meetings.

5The question on employment was not asked in one meeting; the categories of full-time and part-time were combined in another.

 

% Who View The Health Care System as Being in Crisis or Major Problem % that Believe Health Care Should: % Who Think Affordable Health Care Should be Public Policy % Who Believe that Health Care Should Cover:
Meeting Sites Sorted from Lowest to Highest Meeting Sites Sorted by “Everyday Costs” Pay Everyday Costs Protect from High Costs Meeting Sites Sorted from Lowest to Highest Meeting Sites Sorted by Percent Answering “Certain Groups” Certain Groups A Level of Benefits for All
Fargo, ND
87.5%
Eugene, OR
18.9%
80.0%1
Salt Lake City, UT
77.2%
Philadelphia, PA
2.0%
98.0%
Billings, MT
90.2%
Baton Rouge, LA
22.8%
77.2%
Baton Rouge, LA
85.5%
New York, NY
2.1%
97.9%
Little Rock, AR
90.8%
Salt Lake City, UT
25.6%
72.1%1
Las Vegas, NV
87.4%
Phoenix, AZ
2.8%
97.2%

Jackson, MS

93.5%

Billings, MT

26.4%

70.8%1

Fargo, ND

89.4%

Hartford, CT

3.2%

96.8%

Tucson, AZ

94.1%

Des Moines, IA

26.9%

71.0%1

Billings, MT

90.2%

Little Rock, AR

4.2%

95.8%

Salt Lake City, UT

94.5%

Seattle, WA

27.1%

36.2%1

Orlando, FL

90.4%

Eugene, OR

4.4%

95.6%

Lexington, KY

94.5%

Memphis, TN

27.5%

71.3%1

Albuquerque, NM

90.4%

Detroit, MI

4.8%

95.2%

Des Moines, IA

94.9%

Denver, CO

28.0%

71.1%1

Kansas City, MO

90.7%

Orlando, FL

4.9%

81.1%1

Orlando, FL

95.1%

Phoenix, AZ

28.0%

70.0%1

Eugene, OR

91.2%

Denver, CO

5.0%

95.0%

Las Vegas, NV

95.2%

Charlotte, NC

28.6%

70.2%1

Jackson, MS

91.4%

Seattle, WA

6.8%

93.2%

Providence, RI

95.9%

Miami, FL

29.4%

70.6%

Phoenix, AZ

91.5%

Tucson, AZ

6.8%

93.2%

Charlotte, NC

95.9%

Orlando, FL

30.1%

68.3%1

Miami, FL

91.7%

San Antonio, TX

7.1%

92.9%

Memphis, TN

96.1%

Tucson, AZ

31.1%

68.9%

Charlotte, NC

92.0%

Lexington, KY

7.2%

92.8%

Miami, FL

96.2%

Kansas City, MO

31.7%

57.4%1

Des Moines, IA

92.5%

Des Moines, IA

7.4%

92.6%

Kansas City, MO

96.8%

New York, NY

35.2%

46.6%1

Denver, CO

92.9%

Indianapolis, IN

7.5%

92.5%

San Antonio, TX

96.9%

Sacramento, CA

35.6%

62.2%1

Tucson, AZ

93.2%

Jackson, MS

8.3%

91.7%

Phoenix, AZ

97.0%

Indianapolis, IN

36.4%

62.1%1

Providence, RI

93.5%

Sacramento, CA

9.0%

91.0%

Sioux Falls, SD

97.0%

Jackson, MS

42.1%

57.9%

Lexington, KY

93.6%

Memphis, TN

9.6%

90.4%

Indianapolis, IN

97.5%

Cincinnati, OH

43.8%

48.0%1

Indianapolis, IN

94.9%

Kansas City, MO

9.7%

80.6%1

Baton Rouge, LA

98.2%

Detroit, MI

44.9%

50.0%1

Los Angeles, CA

95.4%

Cincinnati, OH

9.7%

90.3%

Eugene, OR

98.2%

Philadelphia, PA

49.0%

49.7%1

San Antonio, TX

95.5%

Los Angeles, CA

9.9%

90.1%

Sacramento, CA

98.4%

Providence, RI

57.8%

40.0%1

Memphis, TN

95.9%

Miami, FL

10.0%

78.9%1

Denver, CO

98.6%

Los Angeles, CA

NA

NA

Little Rock, AR

96.8%

Albuquerque, NM

11.0%

89.0%

Cincinnati, OH

98.9%

Albuquerque, NM

NA

NA

Sioux Falls, SD

97.0%

Billings, MT

13.0%

87.0%

Detroit, MI

99.0%

Hartford, CT

NA

NA

Seattle, WA

97.1%

Providence, RI

17.4%

82.6%

Albuquerque, NM

99.0%

Las Vegas, NV

NA

NA

New York, NY

97.1%

Salt Lake City, UT

18.7%

81.3%

Los Angeles, CA

100.0%

San Antonio, TX

NA

NA

Sacramento, CA

97.6%

Charlotte, NC

18.9%

81.1%

New York, NY

100.0%

Fargo, ND

NA

NA

Cincinnati, OH

98.2%

Baton Rouge, LA

19.6%

67.9%1

Hartford, CT

100.0%

Lexington, KY

NA

NA

Detroit, MI

98.7%

Las Vegas, NV

22.5%

77.5%

Philadelphia, PA

100.0%

Little Rock, AR

NA

NA

Philadelphia, PA

99.3%

Sioux Falls, SD

22.6%

77.4%

Seattle, WA

100.0%

Sioux Falls, SD

NA

NA

Hartford, CT

100.0%

Fargo, ND

23.3%

76.7%

Weighted average

96.8%

Weighted average

33.9%

60.3%1

Weighted average

94.1%

Weighted average

8.9%

89.9%1

1Some respondents selected “Other,” “Unsure” or “No opinion”, so the numbers shown here do not add up to 100 percent.

 

Who ought to decide what is in a basic benefits package? (SELECT ONE.)

Meeting Site

Consumers

Medical Professionals

Government

Employers

Insurance Companies

Some

Combination

Baton Rouge, LA

19.0%

8.6%

5.2%

1.7%

0.0%

65.5%

Charlotte, NC

23.5%

3.7%

1.2%

1.2%

1.2%

69.1%

Cincinnati, OH

25.8%

7.9%

3.6%

1.0%

0.5%

61.2%

Los Angeles, CA

20.6%

15.4%

2.6%

0.4%

0.4%

60.7%

Memphis, TN

28.4%

6.2%

4.9%

0.0%

0.0%

60.5%

Weighted Average

23.8%

9.7%

3.3%

0.8%

0.5%

62.0%

 

On a scale of 1 (no input) to 10 (exclusive input), how much input should each of the following have in deciding what is in a basic benefit package?

Meeting Site

Consumers

Medical Professionals

Federal Government

State/Local Government

Employers

Insurance Companies

Billings, MT

6.3

6.0

5.1

4.7

4.0

2.4

Denver, CO

6.8

6.4

4.2

4.0

3.8

2.5

Des Moines, IA

6.7

5.4

5.0

4.7

2.6

2.2

Detroit, MI

7.6

6.8

3.5

3.7

2.4

1.4

Indianapolis, IN

7.6

6.1

4.9

3.9

3.3

2.2

Jackson, MS

7.8

5.7

3.6

3.0

3.6

1.8

Miami, FL

6.9

5.5

5.0

4.5

3.0

2.3

New York, NY

7.7

6.7

5.2

4.1

2.1

1.4

Philadelphia, PA

6.7

6.0

4.4

4.4

3.1

1.5

Phoenix, AZ

7.7

5.2

3.9

3.7

3.4

2.0

Providence, RI

8.0

6.8

4.1

3.8

2.8

2.3

Sacramento, CA

7.4

6.4

3.8

3.8

2.9

2.5

Salt Lake City, UT

6.8

4.9

4.6

4.7

3.1

2.6

Seattle, WA

7.3

5.9

4.3

4.0

2.3

1.6

Tucson, AZ

6.6

6.2

3.9

3.4

3.2

2.6

Meeting Average
7.2
6.0
4.4
4.0
3.0
2.1
Note:  Not included are community meeting data from Kansas City, Albuquerque, Hartford, Las Vegas, Eugene, San Antonio, Fargo, Lexington, Little Rock, and Sioux Falls because participants did not answer a comparable question.  In the Orlando community meeting, participants grouped responses into categories that were not comparable with the other meetings.

 

Should some people be responsible for paying more than others? What criteria should be used for making some people pay more? Should public policy continue to use tax rules to encourage employer-based health insurance?

  Meeting Sites Sorted from Lowest to Highest

Yes

All pay same

Family size

Health Behaviors

Income

Other

Other or some

combination

Meeting Sites

Yes

Abstain

Sacramento, CA

43.0%

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Albuquerque, NM

39.3%

NA

Indianapolis, IN

58.4%

15.5%

3.6%

29.0%

47.2%

4.7%

NA

Baton Rouge, LA

86.8%

NA

Baton Rouge, LA

59.6%

6.3%

14.6%

27.1%

43.8%

8.3%

NA

Billings, MT

45.8%

NA

Jackson, MS

60.3%

25.5%

4.3%

19.1%

38.3%

12.8%

NA

Charlotte, NC

61.8%

NA

Tucson, AZ

61.0%

18.4%

0.0%

18.4%

50.0%

13.2%

NA

Cincinnati, OH

50.4%

NA

Miami, FL

63.0%

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Denver, CO

38.5%

NA

Orlando, FL

63.9%

20.9%

6.2%

14.7%

41.1%

17.1%

NA

Des Moines, IA

23.9%

NA

Phoenix, AZ

64.6%

26.0%

2.0%

12.0%

52.0%

8.0%

NA

Detroit, MI

23.1%

NA

Denver, CO

66.0%

15.6%

4.4%

15.6%

56.6%

7.8%

NA

Eugene, OR

31.6%

NA

Memphis, TN

66.2%

15.1%

2.7%

11.0%

57.5%

13.7%

NA

Fargo, ND

44.2%

26.9%

Kansas City, MO

72.2%

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Hartford, CT

14.9%

41.4%

Charlotte, NC

72.4%

11.9%

1.2%

27.4%

32.1%

27.4%

NA

Indianapolis, IN

30.8%

NA

Des Moines, IA

73.4%

16.9%

4.2%

15.5%

60.6%

2.8%

NA

Jackson, MS

72.1%

NA

Billings, MT

76.3%

11.9%

7.1%

28.6%

44.0%

8.3%

NA

Kansas City, MO

36.3%

NA

Seattle, WA

77.0%

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Las Vegas, NV

24.7%

NA

Providence, RI

79.2%

20.4%

2.0%

26.5%

44.9%

6.1%

NA

Lexington, KY

63.2%

17.9%

Salt Lake City, UT

80.0%

8.5%

4.2%

22.5%

59.2%

5.6%

NA

Little Rock, AR

41.6%

23.0%

Detroit, MI

81.1%

11.7%

6.5%

6.5%

68.8%

6.5%

NA

Los Angeles, CA

37.4%

NA

Philadelphia, PA

82.5%

7.9%

5.3%

7.0%

70.2%

9.6%

NA

Memphis, TN

29.3%

NA

Fargo, ND

NA

5.7%

0.9%

11.3%

20.8%

NA

61.3%

Miami, FL

67.4%

NA

Little Rock, AR

NA

11.1%

5.1%

6.0%

15.4%

NA

62.4%

New York, NY

NA

NA

Sioux Falls, SD

NA

12.9%

3.2%

22.6%

9.7%

NA

51.6%

Orlando, FL

60.2%

NA

Los Angeles, CA

NA

19.8%

4.1%

10.6%

50.5%

15.0%

NA

Philadelphia, PA

32.1%

NA

Albuquerque, NM

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Phoenix, AZ

53.1%

NA

Hartford, CT

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Providence, RI

26.5%

NA

Las Vegas, NV

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Sacramento, CA

NA

NA

Eugene, OR

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Salt Lake City, UT

52.8%

NA

San Antonio, TX

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

San Antonio, TX

13.7%

48.4%

New York, NY

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Seattle, WA

32.2%

NA

Lexington, KY

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Sioux Falls, SD

NA

NA

Cincinnati, OH

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Tucson, AZ

50.0%

NA

Weighted average

67.7%

15.3%

4.2%

16.2%

47.0%

9.3%

8.0%

Weighted average

41.4%

5.6%

 

How much more would you personally be willing to pay in a year (in premiums, taxes, or through other means) to support efforts that would result in every American having access to affordable, high quality health care coverage and services?

Meeting Site

$0

$1-99

$100-299

$300-999

$1000+

Don’t Know

Albuquerque, NM

21.7%

7.5%

18.3%

18.3%

24.2%

10.0%

Baton Rouge, LA

8.7%

19.6%

19.6%

26.1%

19.6%

6.5%

Billings, MT

15.0%

16.3%

18.8%

18.8%

21.3%

10.0%

Charlotte, NC

44.6%

8.1%

10.8%

9.5%

16.2%

10.8%

Cincinnati, OH

24.2%

19.2%

15.2%

10.1%

11.8%

19.4%

Denver, CO

11.9%

15.7%

16.7%

24.3%

25.2%

6.2%

Des Moines, IA

13.6%

11.9%

15.3%

30.5%

20.3%

8.5%

Detroit, MI

9.7%

12.5%

15.3%

20.8%

33.3%

8.3%

Eugene, OR

13.4%

11.9%

11.9%

17.9%

32.8%

11.9%

Fargo, ND

11.0%

16.0%

30.0%

16.0%

13.0%

14.0%

Hartford, CT

20.0%

10.0%

13.3%

26.7%

21.7%

8.3%

Indianapolis, IN

11.6%

14.9%

14.9%

16.0%

22.1%

20.4%

Jackson, MS

33.9%

16.1%

14.5%

12.9%

4.8%

17.7%

Kansas City, MO

6.7%

12.4%

19.1%

23.6%

24.7%

13.5%

Las Vegas, NV

14.5%

18.4%

21.1%

19.7%

15.8%

10.5%

Lexington, KY

11.2%

15.3%

18.4%

28.6%

20.4%

6.1%

Little Rock, AR

14.0%

26.3%

22.8%

17.5%

7.0%

12.3%

Los Angeles, CA

37.7%

14.4%

8.5%

9.7%

10.6%

19.1%

Memphis, TN

30.9%

1.5%

4.4%

13.2%

30.9%

19.1%

New York, NY

25.4%

3.0%

6.0%

13.4%

35.8%

16.4%

Orlando, FL

17.5%

10.7%

20.4%

14.6%

16.5%

20.4%

Philadelphia, PA

9.0%

12.3%

12.3%

13.1%

27.9%

25.4%

Phoenix, AZ

18.8%

15.3%

20.0%

18.8%

20.0%

7.1%

Providence, RI

23.7%

7.9%

21.1%

15.8%

23.7%

7.9%

Salt Lake City, UT

22.8%

13.9%

20.3%

25.3%

11.4%

6.3%

San Antonio, TX

8.4%

15.0%

23.4%

19.6%

18.7%

15.0%

Sioux Falls, SD

6.3%

15.6%

15.6%

25.0%

28.1%

9.4%

Tucson, AZ

22.6%

19.4%

0.0%

29.0%

12.9%

16.1%

Weighted average

18.9%

14.4%

16.1%

17.4%

19.1%

14.1%

Note: Participants in the Sacramento, CA, Miami, FL and Seattle, WA community meetings did not respond to a comparable question.

 

Please rate each of the following public spending priorities to reach the goal of health care that works for all Americans.
(RANKINGS FROM EACH MEETING WHERE QUESTION WAS ASKED THIS WAY)

Meeting Site

Guarantee Enough Providers

Invest in Public Health

Guarantee Health Insurance for All

Develop Health Information Technology

Improve Minority Access

Biomedical and Technological Research

Ensure Health Care for All, including Safety Net Programs for Poor

Preserve Medicare and Medicaid

Billings, MT

4th

1st

5th

3rd

8th

6th

2nd

7th

Charlotte, NC

5th

1st

4th

8th

7th

6th

2nd

3rd

Cincinnati, OH

4th

2nd

1st

8th

7th

6th

3rd

5th

Denver, CO

6th

4th

1st

8th

5th

7th

2nd

3rd

Des Moines, IA

3rd

2nd

1st

6th

5th

4th

7th

8th

Detroit, MI

3rd

2nd

1st

7th

4th

6th

8th

5th

Eugene, OR

5th

2nd

1st

7th

4th

8th

3rd

6th

Indianapolis, IN

3rd

2nd

1st

8th

5th

7th

4th

6th

Jackson, MS

3rd

5th

2nd

8th

4th

7th

1st

6th

Miami, FL

7th

4th

1st

8th

6th

5th

2nd

3rd

Phoenix, AZ

4th

2nd

1st

6th

3rd

5th

8th

7th

Providence, RI

5th

3rd

1st

7th

2nd

8th

4th

6th

Salt Lake City, UT

4th

1st

5th

6th-T

8th

6th-T

3rd

2nd

Seattle, WA

2nd

3rd

1st

8th

4th

7th

6th

5th

 

Considering the rising cost of health care, which of the following should be the MOST important priority for public spending to reach the goal of health care that works for all Americans? (SELECT ONE)

Meeting Site

Guarantee Enough Providers

Invest in Public Health

Guarantee Health Insurance1 for All

Develop Health Information Technology

Improve Minority Access

Biomedical and Technological Research

Ensure Health Care for All, including Safety Net Programs for Poor

Preserve Medicare and Medicaid

Albuquerque, NM

8.4%
12.2%
58.8%
1.5%
1.5%
0.8%
12.2%
4.6%

Baton Rouge, LA

6.5%
23.9%
37.0%
8.7%
0.0%
2.2%
17.4%
4.3%

Fargo, ND

6.3%
28.1%
42.7%
1.0%
1.0%
4.2%
13.5%
3.1%

Kansas City, MO

3.1%
18.4%
40.8%
1.0%
2.0%
1.0%
33.7%
NA

Las Vegas, NV

9.7%
20.8%
37.5%
2.8%
6.9%
2.8%
12.5%
6.9%

Lexington, KY

5.8%
23.3%
51.5%
2.9%
1.9%
1.0%
10.7%
2.9%

Little Rock, AR

7.4%
22.3%
48.9%
1.1%
1.1%
0.0%
14.9%
4.3%

Los Angeles, CA

9.4%
8.3%
70.7%
0.6%
3.3%
0.0%
5.0%
2.8%

Orlando, FL

3.0%
17.0%
33.0%
3.0%
2.0%
0.0%
31.0%
11.0%

San Antonio, TX

0.9%
23.4%
47.7%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
16.8%
8.4%

Sioux Falls, SD

6.3%
21.9%
46.9%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
18.8%
3.1%

Weighted average

6.2%
18.5%
49.8%
1.9%
2.1%
1.0%
15.8%
4.6%

1In the Hartford community meeting, which is not included in the above table, participants changed the categories to include “Guarantee high quality care for everyone.”  This option was selected by 80% of participants.  Note:  Participants in the Memphis, Philadelphia, Sacramento, New York, and Tucson community meetings did not answer a comparable question.

 

If you believe it is important to ensure access to affordable, high quality health care coverage and services for all Americans, which is most important to you? (SELECT ONE)

Meeting Site

Individual Tax Incentives

Expand State Medicaid,   SCHIP, etc.

Rely on Free Market

Expand Medicare/ FEHBP

Expand Employer Tax Incentives

Employer Insurance Mandate

Expand Neighborhood Health clinics

Create a National Health Program

Individual Insurance Mandate

Increase State Program  Flexibility

Albuquerque, NM

11.1%

2.5%

2.5%

3.7%

2.5%

8.6%

4.9%

56.8%

6.2%

1.2%

Cincinnati, OH

7.8%

11.6%

6.0%

6.6%

3.9%

4.5%

2.4%

39.7%

17.0%

0.6%

Fargo, ND

9.9%

7.7%

7.7%

5.5%

12.1%

4.4%

3.3%

34.1%

9.9%

5.5%

Hartford, CT

0.0%

3.7%

0.0%

3.7%

3.7%

3.7%

5.6%

74.1%

5.6%

0.0%

Las Vegas, NV

5.8%

7.2%

0.0%

8.7%

1.4%

2.9%

2.9%

44.9%

20.3%

5.8%

Lexington, KY

6.3%

5.3%

3.2%

2.1%

2.1%

8.4%

1.1%

54.7%

16.8%

0.0%

Little Rock, AR

11.9%

9.9%

1.0%

11.9%

5.0%

1.0%

5.0%

25.7%

27.7%

1.0%

Los Angeles, CA

6.2%

6.2%

2.6%

7.2%

2.1%

4.1%

6.7%

59.5%

3.6%

1.5%

San Antonio, TX

1.9%

4.9%

4.9%

5.8%

3.9%

1.9%

1.0%

54.4%

19.4%

1.9%

Sioux Falls, SD

7.7%

11.5%

0.0%

15.4%

3.8%

3.8%

0.0%

30.8%

23.1%

3.8%

 

If you believe it is important to ensure access to affordable, high quality health care coverage and services for all Americans, which of these proposals would you suggest for doing this?  (RANKINGS FROM EACH MEETING WHERE QUESTION WAS ASKED THIS WAY)
Meeting Site Individual Tax Incentives Expand State Medicaid,   SCHIP, etc. Rely on Free Market Expand Medicare/ FEHBP Expand Employer Tax Incentives Employer Insurance Mandate Expand Neighborhood Health clinics Create a National Health Program Individual Insurance Mandate Increase State Program  Flexibility

Billings, MT

8th

6th

10th

3rd

7th

9th

2nd

1st

4th

5th

Charlotte, NC

6th

10th

9th

3rd

4th

8th

2nd

5th

1st

7th

Denver, CO

9th

6th

10th

3rd

8th

7th

2nd

1st

4th

5th

Des Moines, IA

7th

6th

10th

2nd

8th

9th

3rd

1st

4th

5th

Detroit, MI

9th

6th

10th

3rd

8th

4th

2nd

1st

5th

7th

Eugene, OR

9th

6th

10th

5th

8th

7th

2nd

1st

4th

3rd

Indianapolis, IN

5th

6th

10th

4th

9th

8th

3rd

1st

2nd

7th

Jackson, MS

9th

7th

10th

3rd

4th

6th

2nd

1st

5th

8th

Kansas City, MO

7th

4th

NA

3rd

5th

9th

2nd

1st

6th

8th

Memphis, TN

7th

5th

10th

3rd

9th

6th

2nd

1st

4th

8th

Miami, FL

9th

4th

10th

3rd

6th

7th

2nd

1st

5th

8th

New York, NY

9th

4th

10th

2nd

8th

6th

3rd

1st

5th

7th

Philadelphia, PA

9th

7th

10th

3rd

8th

5th

2nd

1st

4th

6th

Phoenix, AZ

7th

9th

10th

5th

6th

4th

2nd

1st

3rd

8th

Providence, RI

9th

8th

10th

4th

7th

6th

2nd

1st

3rd

5th

Sacramento, CA

8th

7th

10th

3rd

9th

6th

2nd

1st

4th

5th

Salt Lake City, UT

6th

7th

9th

5th

8th

10th

2nd

3rd

1st

4th

Seattle, WA

9th

7th

10th

4th

8th

6th

2nd

1st

3rd

5th

Tucson, AZ

7th

5th

10th

4th

8th

9th

3rd

2nd

1st

6th

Note: Participants in the Orlando and Baton Rouge community meetings did not answer a comparable question.