Subject: Tax Reform Comment: Congress has done its job very well by honoring its oath of office to keep tax reform within Article 1, Sec. 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution of 1787. Title 5 USC is repreentative of Congress's lawfulness. Title 5 USC prescribes exactly what the federal agencies are to do. The Department of Treasury Secretary has written its implementing regulations to comport to Article 1, Sec. 8, Clause 17. The major problem is that Congress is NOT holding Mark Everson,C.I.R. accountable for the willful misuse and abuse of concealed material facts IRS agents are using on people (not citizens) as "members of the general public, in a locality, as distinguished from a named individual and organization" See 1 CFR 1.1. Title 44 Sec. 1505 explicitly states who is subject to the federal taxes being directors, agencies, employees therein. Without a 'substantive legislative type regulation', no American outside of Article 1, Sec.8, Clause 17 has a tax liability. IRS uses administrative regulations upon the people AFTER they create Identity Theft by creating a 'person' and placing people into a taxable activity to bring people into the administrative arenea. Then IRS can illegally use its administrtative regulations This is concealing material facts, a crime. IRS agents are creating false statements, conspiring with other agents by using hold codes on IMF's to import these false statments, extorting funds from American people, and using the mail to transmit all of these "notices" which are applicable strictly for federal employess and people working for the federal government. Please revist these Laws and described abuses. Take corrective action and make Mark Everson "hew to the law" and then fire the agents who are willfully thumbing their noses at Congress for willfully abusing the laws of Congrsss and operating upon the people without a 'substantive legislative type regulation' in order to extort and make liable people who have no tax liablity. See Chrysler v Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979) and United States ex rel. Accardi v Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 (1954) The Accardi doctrine compels agencies to follow its own rules, regulations or procedures which have an impact on indivdual rights and obligations and obligations or that confer important procedural benefits". Mary Severance |