|
|
|
The
Other End/Far Side |
|
of the
Spectrum |
|
|
|
|
Diversified large agency consistently classified
as a High Performer by HUD: |
|
Cultural posture; early adopter of FSS, MTW;
disposition of war worker housing prior to Hope 6. |
|
Rapidly growing diversified economy with ample
economic and social mobility with state mandated growth controls. |
|
History of regional, bi-state and public-private
cooperation. |
|
|
|
|
Block Grant of Capital & Operating Funds. |
|
Merged Housing Voucher & Public Housing
Budgets. |
|
Time Limits:
5 Years with 2 Years Extension. |
|
Compulsory participation of all able households
(seniors & disabled exempt) in self sufficiency. |
|
Escrow Accounts for all MTW Participants. |
|
Homeownership; child care, case management
provided for successful outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Sustainability. |
|
Continued Strong Growth. |
|
Management/Board Engagement in Strategic
Planning, Thinking and Action. |
|
Strong and Continuing Mixed Finance Track
Record; Nearly 500 Units in 2000. |
|
MTW Agreement Requires Modification. |
|
Modeling/Predicting Portfolio Performance. |
|
|
|
|
1. Block Grant LRPH/Section 8 Capital and
Operating Funds. |
|
2. Safe Harbor for S & P. Strong Agencies, Provide Tangible
Benefits to Diversified Well Managed LHAs. |
|
3. Promote/Incentivize Regional Cooperation with
Alternate Structures including ~ but not limited to ~ Corporate
Consolidation. |
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatives, Short of Consolidation that |
|
Keeps Local Values, Policy Priorities |
|
and Governance
Intact: |
|
|
|
Joint Operating Agreements |
|
Strategic Mutual Management |
|
Divestiture of Certain Product Lines. |
|
|
|
|
|
There Needs to be a Reason; a Quantifiable |
|
Benefit to Rationalizing the Delivering of |
|
Existing Programs: |
|
Organizational Inertia |
|
Labor contracts in states with strong public
employee unions |
|
Perceived loss of security; asset quality or
fiscal control need to be overcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Lift Regulatory Burden/Provide Relief for
Small Agencies: |
|
5 Year Plan, Not Annual |
|
Less Management Oversight |
|
Resident Satisfaction Every 2 ~ 5 Years |
|
Maintain Fiscal Control |
|
Senior Income Reexams Every 2~5 Years |
|
Expand MTW to 100 Local Agencies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Enable Major New Production: |
|
Mixed Income |
|
Capital Subsidy/Deferred Loan, not
operating subsidy |
|
Examine something other than the current
orthodoxy on Capitol Hill; eschew State Formula Distribution |
|
Seductively simple, but undercuts local
investment and outcomes |
|
Absolves locals of responsibilities |
|
States should pay to play. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bond Guarantee Fund for LHAs |
|
Ensure Mixed Use Capabilities |
|
|
|
6. MTW Refinements and Expansion. |
|
7. Hope 6 Reauthorization Link to Smart
Growth. |
|
8. Support Creative Ventures Such as the
NAHRO Access Alliance. |
|